Riba Rambles:
Musings of a Mental Magpie

About the author: Elisabeth in early 2007, photo by Todd Belf
Elisabeth "Lis" Riba is an infovore with an MLS. This is her place to share whatever's on her mind, on topics both personal and political. [more]
Latest posts:
Search archives:
  or
Special collections:
Also by this blogger:
Blogroll:

Blogroll Me!
If you are searching for any of the following names -- Elizabeth Reba, Elizabeth Riba, Elisabeth Reba, Liz Reba, Lis Reba, Liz Riba, Elizabeth Ann Reba, Elizabeth Ann Riba, Elizabeth Anne Reba, Elizabeth Anne Riba, Elisabeth Ann Reba, Elisabeth Ann Riba, or Elisabeth Anne Reba -- welcome to my blog. Here's my homepage.

This page is powered by Blogger.
 
Saturday, June 12, 2004
Yesterday
Posted by Lis Riba at 3:15 PM

When I was listing books coming out in September, I forgot a fourth title: The Grand Tour by Patricia Wrede and Caroline Stevermer, a sequel to The Enchanted Teapot (also published as Sorcery and Cecilia). That's due September 1st, leaving only one weekend in September when I'm not anticipating a new book in a series I'm following, and that's the weekend of Worldcon.

Had a lot of fun yesterday. One positive thing about having little money is that you can find all kinds of creative ways to have fun on the cheap. Having money, it's much easier to yield to temptation and do the easy thing of just buying things to cheer onesself up. Without money, one has to work harder but it's somehow much more rewarding for the effort.

I had to drop Ian off at work yesterday at 4:30. I was somewhat hungry, but traffic heading home was massively backed up, even before rush hour. I decided that I wanted to spend no more than $5 for lunch, so started thinking where the best options were. After a little consideration, I went to Porter Square, found a parking meter with 20 minutes and went to the Japanese supermarket at Porter Exchange. We had been meaning to take a trip there anyway, because we were out of tofu, and they have a brand that's both cheaper and tastier than what we get at the local supermarkets. [Mori-Nu, 89¢, hekshered and doesn't require refrigeration] And for myself, I found a salmon-rice-ball wrapped in seaweed, a bottled tea drink and a red bean cake, all for $4.70. I got back to my car only about seven minutes after the meter expired (no ticket, fortunately). So I sat on some nearby steps (in case a meter maid showed up) to eat and enjoy the pleasant weather. It was really quite tasty and filling. And I'm pleased with myself for the bargain.

After that, I went driving around Harvard Square to make reservations for our anniversary dinner. This was complicated by the fact that I didn't actually have the restaurant's street address. But after a few twists and turns and stopping several times to check my map, I found it and the deed was done. And just on first glance, I think it's going to live up to its reputation.

By that time, it was after 6 pm, when parking becomes free at metered spaces. So I headed back to Harvard Square. I needed to circle the square twice beofre I found a spot, and spent the next several hours browsing around. Found several books I'll want to check out from the library. [A new novel in Charlaine Harris' Southern vampire series, Birth of the chess queen and Dissolution were ones I thought to write down.] I checked the latest punny window display from a children's store known for them: Cats-ablanca. Groan! I also saw the niftiest timepiece ever: the Stonehenge pocket watch. It's a fully functional pocket watch, but inside it contains a compass, a little model of stonehenge (with arrow for which direction should point north), and a gnomon, so it can be used as an actual sundial. I thought that was just so cool!

I also spent some time watching the street performers. Over at the pit, two kids were making impressive percussion music with a drumset entirely of found objects. At Brattle Square, I caught the last half of an act by somebody named Dave. His big finale was to juggle three knives ("just your average, everyday kitchen machetes!") while upside-down! Impressive trick and he had a great shtick. ["The average donation I receive is fifty dollars. Don't laugh! The tourists might believe it!" Though I didn't have any cash to donate, I did thank him afterwards for a good show.]

I left the Square about 9pm, offering a friend who works in one of the stores a ride home after his shift ended.

All-in-all, an incredibly pleasant evening with no cost but my meal. And I felt good, not just because I enjoyed myself, but pleased with my ingenuity and frugality.

This evening we're spending with Ian's parents and grandparents. Hope you have a fun weekend, too!

British Invasion tomorrow
Posted by Lis Riba at 1:05 PM

Two weeks ago, I mentioned: The Boston Gay Men's Chorus presents British Invasion: the songs of Elton John and Queen. I know this is rather last minute, but Ian and I did get tickets for tomorrow evening's show. 7pm at the Emerson Majestic Theatre, cheap seats are $12 apiece. [I bought them directly at the box office to avoid the additional payoff to Ticketmaster.] The show is supposed to run two hours and ten minutes. We don't yet know what we're going to do tomorrow day before the show (Possibly Boston Pride, possibly the Scooper Bowl, possibly something else entirely), but we have dinner reservations at ten in Harvard Square, so won't be able to socialize after the show. But, since people expressed an interest, I thought I should let you know.

Friday, June 11, 2004
One last Reagan tribute
Posted by Lis Riba at 1:00 PM

I've just gotta ask:

Are you better off now than you were four years ago?

Speaking strictly for myself, the answer is an emphatic No.

I don't know what your answer is, but it's something to consider this election.

A rant and thought experiment
Posted by Lis Riba at 11:15 AM

Just reading all the Reagan-idolatry that's been going on in the week since his death (and since I don't watch TV, I'm sure I'm only getting a small fraction of the coverage). Lots of rosy revisionism, and less-than-flattering truths are being hushed as disrespectful. Maybe later we can take a more balanced view, but he only just died, he was a President so should be treated with dignity.

If Bill Clinton dropped dead, do you think the media would be fawning over him in this manner? Would his legacy be handled with kid gloves? Would the Lewinsky scandal be swept under the rug the way they're doing with Iran-Contra, so they could focus more on his accomplishments? Think of the pundits you've read or heard or seen offering tributes to Reagan this week, and imagine what those same people would write or say if it were Clinton instead.
[I'm trying to remember the coverage after Nixon's death. He was respected as a statesman, but Watergate was also prominently mentioned.]

Frankly, I'm getting really sick of how thick they're laying it. I understand that many people liked and loved the man, but come on! he was still human. He put his pants on one leg at a time, just like the rest of us.

I sincerely hope Nancy Reagan will find comfort, but after today's funeral, I really wish everybody would just shut up about him and get on with the important issues of the day.

Rambling about Reagan
Posted by Lis Riba at 10:35 AM

Since everybody else has been posting their reminiscences about Reagan this week, I suppose I should do so today, before it becomes hopelessly outdated. Hopefully the media will find something new and more substantial to report on this weekend. Like, say, new revelations about Abu Ghraib... But I digress.

I found Fernwithy's sentiments quite similar to my own feelings this week:

You know, with all the reminiscences about Reagan lately, I thought I'd find myself more affected by this than I actually am. I'm not sure why I thought this; it just seemed to be the done thing. The 80s were the time when I became myself--Reagan was elected the year I turned ten, and left office the year I turned eighteen.

In our mock presidential elections in fifth grade, I voted for Reagan, so for some paradoxical reason, I feel vaguely responsible for his getting into office, even though objectively I had nothing to do with it. [During the campaign I actually supported John Anderson, because his proposals seemed far more pragmatic than Carter's or Reagan's and I liked that forthrightness. But when push came to shove in the class election, I knew Anderson wasn't electable and went with Reagan to get Carter out of office. (Hey! I was ten!)]

One of my few clear memories regarding Reagan's earliest years was when I found out Reagan had been shot. The principal announced it over the loudspeakers while I was in art class. A few kids in the class (not me) applauded, and the teacher spent the rest of the period lecturing us on how inappropriate that behavior was.

I don't know when I became disenchanted with Reagan, but it happened pretty early in his first term, while we still lived in Wisconsin. Maybe it was because my father was out of work and I was eating subsidized school lunches. I remember an article about ketchup as a vegetable that I clipped and saved for a long while. [All I can remember of it now was something about how kids also eat paste, so maybe that should be added to school menus.] And I think it's rather sad when a middle school student could poke holes in the President's proposals and see that they didn't reflect what was going on in the real world.

At any rate, by the 1984 election, I was firmly anti-Reagan and wanted him out of office. I thought the whole SDI idea was stupid and impractical and very likely impossible. But I also didn't care for the Mondale campaign. I can no longer remember whether it was something about his policies or the way he ran his campaign, but I thought he was unelectable. [Anderson in 1980 and Mondale in 1984 showed that the American public preferred obvious lies to unpleasant truths. "Mr. Reagan will raise taxes, and so will I. He won't tell you. I just did."] At any rate, it was at this time that I began to take an interest in politics, and began to daydream about running for president someday. Because, at fourteen years old, I was clearly more intelligent than both the major party candidates. (Hey! I was fourteen!) In the elections held in Social Studies class, I did vote for Mondale, upsetting my friend who was expecting more votes for Bill'n'Opus.

Just as an aside, another memory of Reagan's America that sticks with me was the nuclear threat. In the early 1990s, when the "Generation-X as slacker" stereotype was at its peak (before we left all that behind to become dotcom workaholics), I used to wonder whether that persistent fear of nuclear annhilation might not be a contributing cause.

It's hard to recall now, but when we were growing up, a nuclear World War III seemed like a foregone conclusion. The entire pop culture was saturated with these images. Just off the top of my head two decades later:
That was the peak of post-apocalyptic scenarios in science fiction. I remember how the critics were so impressed by David Brin's "Postman" for actually having an optimistic outlook. Movies like Wargames, Red Dawn, Mad Max, The Day After... (and don't forget all the hoopla surrounding that!), ... Music and music videos: Men at Work "It's a Mistake," Queen "Hammer to Fall," Frankie Goes To Hollywood "Two Tribes," Genesis "Land of Confusion." A popular song by Sting tried to reassure us that the "Russians love their children too." Think about what that message implies, and the fact it needed to be verbalized. And that kind of thing was repeated over and over in our news and entertainment and the schools.

Back in high school, my friends and I knew where the nearest Russian missle target was (the Air Force base across the Bay) and in class we had diagrammed out the destruction zones to see how much fallout we and our families could expect. [These people will die instantly in the blast, these folks have X chance of survival, and so forth] And the really scary thing about this was that the folks who would die instantly were considered the lucky ones. Survival after a nuclear war was not something to look forward to.

To everyone's surprise, the Cold War thawed within our lifetimes. We were all going to survive. So then this group of kids who expected to have no future had to start planning for one. Is it terribly surprising that the first reaction out of college was less-than-gung-ho?

At any rate, Reagan's second term mostly overlapped my highschool years. Formative years for me politically. My first year in college, I became more of an activist and volunteered for Democratic political campaigns in the primary and general elections (actually watched the second presidential debate from the floor of Dukakis' campaign HQ!) In Jerry Cohen's Intro to Amstd class, I read Garry Wills' Reagan's America [I was supposed to write a paper evaluating Reagan in relation to Daniel Boorstin's The Image, an effort that was somewhat hampered by the fact that Reagan's biography took so long to read that I didn't have time to do more than skim the latter book. I've been meaning to read it in full for years, and with all the memories this week has dredged up, I've finally dug it out of the bookshelves and am about three chapters in. I highly recommend it.]

At any rate, while I'm sure I'm forgetting things, I think that covers what was important in my memories of and relationship with Ronald Reagan. The Alzheimer's revelation after he retired didn't seem at all surprising, because we had suspected something like that for a while. Ian, four years younger than I, has said that by the 1984 election, all his friends were pretty certain Reagan was senile. He once wrote:

I remember being terrified that no adults seemed to notice. It was like the Emperor's New Clothes, but nobody was listening to the kids.

And that seems to sum up a lot of what I remember about Reagan.

Thursday, June 10, 2004
Who, me?
Posted by Lis Riba at 11:30 PM
Who are you REALLY? (what you are deep inside yourself)
Full Name
Age
You are Female
Your age is 3
Your hair is short blue hair
Your spirit is a thunderstorm
This cool quiz by Midnight_Sunrise - Taken 2914 Times.
New! Get Free Horoscopes from Kwiz.Biz

Damn! but that's one poorly coded quiz. I think I spent at least fifteen minutes correcting HTML errors before Blogger would let me publish it. But I'm still amused by my results.

Humor is truth -- Victor Borge
Posted by Lis Riba at 9:50 AM

How is it that The Onion and The Daily Show consistently manage to produce the most insightful commentary on current events? From this week's Onion:

Reagan To Be Honored With $5,000-A-Head Funeral
WASHINGTON, DC—Former President Ronald Reagan will be honored with five days of memorial services, culminating in a $5,000 a head funeral in Washington's National Cathedral Friday, Paul Darlington, a spokesman for the Bush re-election campaign, said Monday. "At 5:15 p.m. EST, former President Reagan will be escorted from the U.S. Capitol and received with ceremony at the Washington National Cathedral, where a dinner of baby arugula, roast beef, and herbed red potatoes will commence," Darlington said. "As Reagan lies in repose, a host of leading Republican party members will be available for photo opportunities. President Bush, who will deliver a eulogy at the close of the solemn gathering, is urging all Americans to dig deep into their hearts to honor this great leader." Several thousand people are expected to pay their respects.

I just found a Groucho Marx quote: "Humor is reason gone mad." Perhaps in these mad times, only humor is capable of seeing through the spin...

Rights and wrongs
Posted by Lis Riba at 9:35 AM

Remember what I wrote yesterday about impending Supreme Court decisions?

According to Newsweek,

[There is] a growing sense of gloom within Justice that the Supreme Court is likely to rule decisively against the Bush administration not just in the Padilla case but in two other pivotal cases in the war on terror: one involving the detention of another "enemy combatant," Yasir Hamden, and another involving the treatment of Al Qaeda and Taliban prisoners at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. In the Padilla and Hambdi cases, the administration is arguing it has the right to hold the two U.S. citizens indefinitely without trial. In the Guantanamo case, the administration argues that foreign nationals being interrogated there there do not have the right to challenge their detention in federal courts.

Lawyers within the Justice Department are now bracing for defeat in both the enemy-combatant and Guantanamo cases, both of which are expected to be decided before the Supreme Court ends its term at the end of the month, according to one conservative and politically well-connected lawyer. "They are 99 percent certain they are going to lose," said the lawyer, who asked not to be identified. "It's a very sobering realization."

While Supreme Court forecasts are hazardous at best, the conventional wisdom among former Supreme Court clerks is that recent disclosures about the Abu Ghraib prison scandal and internal administration memos disavowing compliance with international treaties involving treatment of prisoners has badly hurt the government's arguments before the court and turned two key "swing" justices?Sandra Day O'Connor and Anthony Kennedy?against it, the lawyer said.

Insider thinking within Justice has the Supreme Court voting six to three against the administration on Guantanamo and by a perhaps even larger margin in the Padilla and Hamdi cases.

The bulk of the article is about Justice Department lawyers scrambling to come up with a viable "conventional criminal case" against Padilla. And they're not having much luck. Most of the charges against him have been flat-out wrong, and since he's been denied access to a lawyer, his own statements under interrogation wouldn't be admissible in court. You see, the Constitutional protections benefit the government as well. As Dahlia Lithwick writes in Slate:

The U.S. Constitution didn't simply hatch out of an egg one morning. Like the Magna Carta, the Bill of Rights was largely conceived to correct for failures of earlier systems. In 1603 Sir Walter Raleigh was tried for treason and not permitted to cross-examine his accuser. This, it turns out, engendered unreliable evidence. The Sixth Amendment's confrontation clause was the constitutional remedy for this problem. Unremitting and unwanted prosecutorial interrogation could lead to false confessions. This made for unreliable evidence. The Fifth Amendment was, in part, the constitutional remedy for this. Years of delay prior to trials degraded evidence. The Sixth Amendment's right to a speedy trial was the constitutional remedy for this. Indefinite government detention without charges led to innocent men languishing in prison without recourse. The right to habeas corpus is thus codified in Article I, Section 9 of the Constitution to remedy this. We sometimes forget that the purpose of these and other constitutional protections is not only to let guilty guys roam free (attractive though that prospect may seem), the purpose is also to protect the quality of the evidence used in criminal trials. A conviction based on a tortured confession isn't justice. It's theater.

That's probably why the government has been frantically declassifying information on Padilla that wouldn't hold up in a courtroom, and releasing it to the news media in an effort to discredit him in the court of public opinion. At the same time, "the government has ruled that Padilla's attorneys cannot tell anyone what Padilla would say in answer to any government accusations because everything he told his lawyers is classified." [Nat Hentoff in The Village Voice]

As my friend Rosefox recently wrote about the proposed searches of people and property in the MBTA, though it applies to these issues as well:

I am sick and fucking tired of government agents and agencies claiming that the only way to protect people is to abrogate the civil liberties that they are also sworn to protect. They're wrong, and what we end up with is a gutted Constitution and dead people. Our soldiers are theoretically in Iraq and Afghanistan (anyone remember Afghanistan?) to give their lives in defense of liberty, justice, and the American way. I personally consider it the responsibility of every adult not in uniform to make sure that all three of those still exist when they come home.
Fanfic title up for grabs
Posted by Lis Riba at 8:54 AM

The Leaky Cauldron has transscribed a recent interview with David Thewlis. He describes Professor Lupin, the character he plays in the films, as:

But he's basically the new Defence against the Dark Arts teacher...that's Arts, not arse. (laughter) Defence against the Dark Arse...I feel a sequel coming on(laughter).

Defense Against the Dark Arse. Sounds more like a fanfic title to me. Anybody?

Fraud-ian slips
Posted by Lis Riba at 7:30 AM

In the past several days I saw two shocking and underreported stories about government work this administration has privatized. I don't think either story is getting near enough attention, so maybe you kind readers can help spread the word.


Halliburton sends empty trucks crisscrossing Iraq, bilking government money and endangering military escorts
     Miami Herald by way of Suburban Guerrilla

This story first broke a few weeks ago but no one seems to be paying much attention:
WASHINGTON - A dozen current and former truck drivers for a Halliburton Inc. subsidiary said they were directed to drive empty flatbed trucks crisscrossing Iraq more than 100 times this year, putting themselves and military escorts at risk for no apparent purpose.

The truckers, who regularly made the 300-mile resupply run from Camp Cedar in southern Iraq to Camp Anaconda near Baghdad, told Knight Ridder newspapers that their employer charged the government for hauling what the truckers derisively called "sailboat fuel."

"It was one thing to risk your life to haul things the military needed. It's another to haul empty trailers," said David Wilson, a southwest Florida truck driver who had commanded 100 of the Iraqi truck convoys for the Halliburton subsidiary.

Kellogg Brown and Root (KBR), the subsidiary, the Army, and the truckers gave different reasons for why empty trucks were driven through areas that the drivers nicknamed "rockville" and "slaughterhouse" for the dangers they presented.

FOIA Requests Outsourced to Contractor in Abu Ghraib Scandal
     Washington Post via Change for America via Interesting Times

So I was looking through the Washington Post for something juicy to write about and fell upon this article about how the US Government is contracting out Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests because they have such an obscene backlog. They can't catch up with all the people who want to know stuff. Towards the end of the article, I read this:
Contractors who have performed FOIA work for federal agencies include CACI International Inc. of Arlington and McNeil Technologies of Springfield.
You may remember the name CACI International from the great classic Abu Ghraib torture scandal. They were the guys who had a staff member in charge of interrogation at the prison. So now they are also in charge of FOIA requests, rummaging through top secret government files. What else has this contractor been up to? Supposedly, nothing much. From the Richmond Times Dispatch:
A defense contractor supplying civilian interrogators to the U.S. military at the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq is the subject of five government investigations, the company president said yesterday.
continued at Change for America

What kind of work are CACI contractors doing? According to the Washington Post:

The analysts are involved in nearly every phase of answering a FOIA request -- retrieving documents, reviewing them for relevance, blacking out portions that pose security concerns and composing a response. But it is government officials who make the final decisions on what is released, Ayoub said.

Are you outraged yet?

Wednesday, June 09, 2004
All wet
Posted by Lis Riba at 9:15 PM

Well, the heat finally broke... into a thunderstorm. It's now pouring out. I hear regular rolls of thunder and the occasional flash of lightning. Thank goodness my current computer is a laptop (even if I no longer trust it to be mobile). The laptop battery means that the machine doesn't shut off when the power goes out, so brownouts don't bother it much at all, and it gives me a chance to save my work and close the machine properly if the outage looks to be a long one.

And I still will have to pick Ian up from work sometime this evening. Fortunately he likes the wet t-shirt look.

Counterspin
Posted by Lis Riba at 5:20 PM

By the way, does anybody know what's going on with Counterspin by Hesiod? For a while, I was getting an image of a crying baby intermittenly with his most recent posts, but now it seems like there's no content but for that graphic.
Has he quit? Did he move to a new URL without my knowledge? I really want to know.

Too darned hot
Posted by Lis Riba at 5:10 PM

I'm sweltering in here. Needless to say, our A/C is still in the basement, Ian's at work, and I can't move it on my own. Oh well, hopefully it will cool off as the sun goes down. And tomorrow is supposed to be much cooler. (Enough so that I'm afraid of catching a cold from the temperature drop, something I can be prone to.)

Barely got any work done on the jobhunting front today. Made a couple phone calls, scanned the listings for any new openings, but that was about it. Tonight when it's cooler, I'm going to try writing those job letters, so I can take them to Kinkos for printing and get them in tomorrow's mail.

Also meant to blog that I'll have to save money for September. Three new books in series I'm avidly following are coming out then:

  • September 14: The Bartimaeus Trilogy, Book Two: The Golem's Eye. by Jonathan Stroud
  • September 21: The Grim Grotto by Lemony Snicket
  • September 28: Trickster's Queen by Tamora Pierce

And that's all after WorldCon (to which Ian and I bought memberships for several years back). Gd willing, I'll have a job long before then and can enjoy myself without worrying about the cost.

For now, I skimmed thru Nancy Pearl's Book Lust yesterday, and took about two pages (in my steno pad) of books that sounded interesting. So I went to the library last night and picked up three or four. I had hoped the library would have Alfonso Cuaron's Little princess. Everybody's been praising it with respect to his work on Harry Potter, so I read the book and now want to see the film. Unfortunately, though the library catalog said the video was on shelf, it was nowhere to be found. And since the last recorded checkout ws four years ago, it's likely long lost. However, they did offer to get me a copy from another library. [I worry about videos from other libraries, since I'm never quite certain of other libraries' "rental" policies.]

Anyway, I'm blathering now, so I'll get off the computer for the moment and hope things cool down a bit.

Minor miffs
Posted by Lis Riba at 2:30 PM

Just a few short tidbits I want to get off my chest...


Sigh, Reagan isn't even in his grave and the rush to rename things in his honor proceeds apace. Republicans have revived the Reagan Dime Act, although they've generously offered that 50% of dimes can keep Roosevelt's picture. There are also moves for him to replace Hamilton on the $10 bill, or Andrew Jackson on the $20. I'm not sure whether the sponsors of those movements are working together -- do they want Reagan on both bills and the coin, or will the others concede if one of them passes? [Actually, I wouldn't mind the $20 so much, but that's because we really don't like Andrew "John Marshall has made his decision, now let him enforce it!" Jackson.]

If that isn't enough, Frist apparently wants to rename the Pentagon to "Ronald Reagan National Defense Building," and he's attaching a rider to an appropriations bill which would do just that.

He also wants to call the Missile Defense Agency "Ronald Reagan Missile Defense Agency." That one, I have no objections to. In many respects, Star Wars/SDI was Reagan's baby, and I have no problem whatsoever with him getting the credit (or blame) for the entire project.


For the second weekend in a row, both drive-ins within reasonable distance from our home are pairing movies I really want to see with movies I really don't want to see. I thought Milford might have a tolerable double-feature, Shrek 2 and Stepford Wives, but this weekend is our wedding anniversary, and the latter doesn't quite seem appropriate for the occasion. I don't want Ian getting any ideas.


While in San Francisco, I finally got myself a new watch to replace my old pocket watch which finally died. This was a carabiner watch with a little flashlight. Really great until about two weeks ago it died. I'm going to take it to a watch shop and see if it's just a dead battery, but I'm worried by the fact that the flashlight still works. If the battery were dead, wouldn't they both fail? Or do they run on separate circuits? And if the watch is dead, I bought it in San Francisco, so I can't easily take it back to the store. Regardless, I'm really annoyed by it.

Relevant rulings?
Posted by Lis Riba at 2:10 PM

Needless to say, there's been a lot of discussion (nearly a third of the Boston LJ community, for example) about plans by the MBTA (the local public transit system) to conduct random bag & ID checks of people using the system. So many words have been written, many of them (she kvells) by Ian himself, that I don't feel much need to address it further. However, I expect an impending ruling by the Supreme Court, Hiibel v. Nevada, over whether people must show ID when cops demand it, will be very influential on how it shakes out.

I also read an interesting article on SCOTUSblog about some of the latest revelations in the news, to wit:

In summary, the news accounts have brought out the acknowledged abuse of Iraqi prisoners in U.S. military custody at Abu Ghraib prison, the accusations that torture may have been used on detainees at Guantanamo, the sudden release of previously classified details about the alleged terrorist plans of enemy combatant Jose Padilla, and, most recently, the discovery of a pile of government documents suggesting that Bush administration lawyers had devised arguments that would seem to justify, in a legal sense, the use of torture to obtain information from captured suspects.

and whether these would have any effect on the Justices' deliberations on cases they haven't yet released rulings for. After all, as I mentioned previously, the administration deliberately held CBS back until after the oral arguments before the Court.

And I realized, there are a number of major Court rulings due between now and the end of the month. There's Hiibel, of course. Padilla's right to a lawyer. The legal status of Guantanamo prisoners (which may be complicated by the recent DOJ memo on torture that makes the exact opposite argument re:Guantanamo's legal status as they argued in the court). There's still the matter of Cheney's energy commission and the extent of executive privilege. According to a list by Medill, the 22 cases remaining include two on Miranda rights, the Pledge of Allegiance, the legality of COPA, and many others...

And we should get rulings on all of these within the next 21 days.

These are some major bombshells, many of them relating to civil liberties, and besides the precedent and impact upon our daily lives, probably will impact the presidential race.

Interesting times, people. Interesting times...

The heat of the moment
Posted by Lis Riba at 7:30 AM

Woke up ungodly early (for me) this morning due to the heat. [It broke 80 yesterday, and weather.com already puts the current temperature at over 70; my goodness! it's supposed to break 90 today!] So let's get an early start by checking this week's Free Will Astrology horoscope:

Jean-Dominique Bauby was a 43-year-old editor when he suffered an unusual stroke. Though his brain remained undamaged, his entire body was paralyzed except for his left eye. Slowly he learned to communicate in code by blinking, and over the next two years he dictated a memoir. Feeling as if he were trapped in a diving bell, but with his imagination as free as a butterfly, he called his book The Diving Bell and the Butterfly. Critics have described it as "inspirational" and "a jewel." Bauby is your role model during this last difficult phase of your yearly cycle, Cancerian. Though you won't suffer from any physical affliction, your psychic turmoil may make you feel imprisoned and inaccessible. And yet I promise you that you can find a way to liberate your mind and convey luminous truths to the people who matter.

Is it just me, or does this give you a terribly ominous feeling.

In the meantime, I've been steadily applying for jobs. I don't want to say too much about which jobs I'm applying for. Not so much superstition, but in case a potential employer Googles for me, I don't want them discovering they are or are not among my top choices. Today's goal is to write up cover letters for all the postings I've found which don't provide email addresses or electronic forms, and get them printed up and in the mail. Also (well, I'll mention this one listing), the public library directly to our north has an opening for a Young Adult Librarian (that refers to subject matter, not age of applicant). Since I started tracking every book I read in the summer of 2000, about one-third of my reading has been from YA material, so I have a decent idea of what's out there and what to recommend. At any rate, since the library is so close (only 2.5 miles away), rather than impersonally mailing my resume, I want to head up there and chat with them.


Anyway, since Ian and I were both up so early, and because I'm reading about all those big Iowa breakfasts in Postville, I've decided we can splurge and get breakfast at the local diner. [We haven't spent money on anything but the barest necessities since I saw the movie on Friday; we can treat ourselves this once.]

Tuesday, June 08, 2004
Dewey or don't we?
Posted by Lis Riba at 6:30 PM

Via Justin du Coeur, who provides occasional updates on new and interesting public domain e-books:

Recent eBooks from Project Gutenberg:

Dewey Decimal Classification (from the 1976 reprint of the 1876 original). Tables. Lots and lots of tables. But it's tables about books! (Did you know that category 678 is just "Cotton"? Some classifications made a lot more sense a century ago.)

Obviously, these have been superceded by newer versions, but for the curious and the cheap, these should prove interesting.

Culture of death?
Posted by Lis Riba at 2:40 PM

Well, apparently I wasn't the first to comment on viewing Reagan's memorial through the lens of Paul Wellstone's. Dimmy Karras is just one example I found since writing my previous post.

For scorecard purposes, Greg Abbott listed some of the most impressive quotes:

With a little Google work, I've found a number of eloquent expressions of outrage at the political exploitation of death from leading Republicans (the bolded text below is my emphasis).
<snip>
A Weekly Standard editorial written by Christopher Caldwell claimed "nationwide outrage over last week's 'memorial service' for Wellstone." He went on:
"Millions of Americans--and 55 percent of Minnesota households--tuned in on television to watch a solemn commemoration and found a rally devoted to a politics that was twisted, pagan, childish, inhumane, and even totalitarian beyond their worst nightmares.

Most of those who watched this spectacle felt a disgust bordering on shame. . . . But such feelings arose from decency, not partisanship. . . .The Democrats' beyond-the-pale politicization of Wellstone's death opened the way for Republican Norm Coleman . . .

The late senator was treated as little more than one broken egg in a great get-out-the-vote omelet. The pilots and aides who died with him were barely treated at all.This Machiavellian glibness in the face of death was what left viewers most uneasy. One of our major political parties, or at least a sizable wing of it, appeared to be dancing a jig on the grave of a particularly beloved fallen comrade. What must they think of the rest of us?"
CNN's Tucker Carlson said:
"The political world is still reeling tonight from yesterday's nauseating display in Minnesota, where a memorial service for the late Sen. Paul Wellstone was hijacked by partisan zealots and turned into a political rally."
William Bennett wrote on the "Empower America" website:
"Nothing is too monumental, nothing is too important, nothing is too serious not to become a cause political for the Democrats.

I watched the spectacle in Minnesota and realized there was almost nothing the Democrats would not do to win an election.

The memorial service cum political rally for Senator Wellstone brought the sacred low. The 2002 Democrats' politics of death may yield a certain death to politics. And their political contretemps - abuse of law, cynicism, a win-at-any-cost approach, lying - have turned the Democratic party into a Nixon party . . ."
Peggy Noonan wrote an entire column as if Wellstone was speaking from the grave to criticize his own family and supporters:
"You can make your life sick and small, you can fill it with poison, when you turn everything into politics. And what makes me sad is not that you used my death to get out the vote. It's not that you were cold. It's that the only way you could show any warmth was through politics.

That memorial was the triumph of politics at the expense of the personal. At the expense of what makes you human."
Vin Weber, former Republican congressman from Minnesota, quoted by CNN on October 30th, 2002:
"To them [Democrats], Wellstone's death, apparently, was just another campaign event"
Fred Barnes, writing in the Weekly Standard, October 30th, 2002:
The exploitationof Wellstone's memory began within two days of his death. . . . The memorial service was shameless in its partisanship.

Also, I found an old post from Seeing the Forest pointing out "Republicans are complaining that Sen. Paul Wellstone's memorial service was broadcast on TV in Minnesota. They say it was giving 'free airtime' to Democrats."

Personally, I think there's one major obstacle that may prevent Reagan's funeral from becoming an election tool: Nancy. Say what you will about her, she's very strongwilled when standing up for herself or her husband. She stood up in favor of stem cell research at a time the party leadership opposed it. She singlehandedly blocked attempts by the Ronald Reagan Legacy Project to put Ronnie's likeness on the dime and to name a university after him. [Partisans are now pushing for the ten dollar bill again, as well as suggesting Reagan could get half the dimes, shared with Roosevelt.] We probably don't know how many other such projects she's put the kibosh on, and I worry what will happen when she dies and there's nobody of influence to put that kind of check on Norquist's Reagan idolators.
At any rate, I don't think Nancy would want her husband's funeral to turn into the kind of circus GOP political brokers might otherwise attempt. [Get a load of Bush's official election site -- the front page has been completely redone into a paeon to Reagan.]

Anyway, as Daily Kos wrote yesterday, "Well, they set the standards. It'll be our job to hold them to those standards."

Things to come
Posted by Lis Riba at 12:10 PM

Considering the way Republicans manufactured outrage over alleged politicizing of Paul Wellstone's memorial, they wouldn't dare use Reagan's funeral as an excuse for any politicking. Right? Right??

Oh, I forgot. The modern Republican party seems to be built on hypocrisy.

Well, at the very least, when they do politicize the funeral and memorial services, voices on the left ought to call them on it, pointing out the contrast with their own statements barely two years ago.

Job listing nuisances
Posted by Lis Riba at 9:35 AM

(1) The popularity of phrases like "code libraries" and "script libraries" in the computer industry, or "chemical libraries" and "code libraries" in pharmeceuticals.

(2) The fact that every single listing at MIT, including custodian, includes mention of their "educational resources, sophisticated computing environment, rich libraries."

Makes keyword searching very annoying...

Monday, June 07, 2004
Help wanted
Posted by Lis Riba at 6:25 PM

If you can recommend for or against any contracting or temp agencies or headhunters in the Boston area I would greatly appreciate it. I'm already listed with Wontawk (library-specific), but I would greatly appreciate any other companies you know of.

Come on, I know some of you reading this have used contract agencies or temp agencies within the last year; surely you can name for me at least one good (or bad) company!

These are the jokes, folks
Posted by Lis Riba at 6:20 PM

From Seeing the forest:

President Bush gets out of his helicopter in front of the White House carrying a baby pig under each arm.

The Marine guard snaps to attention, salutes, and says: "Nice pigs, sir."

Bush replies: "These are not pigs, these are Texan Razorback Hogs. I got one for Vice-President Cheney, and I got one for Defence Secretary Rumsfeld."

The Marine again snaps to attention, salutes, and says, "Nice trade, sir."

From Skippy:

the white house - 2005

one sunny day in 2005, an old man approached the white house from across pennsylvania avenue, where he'd been sitting on a park bench he spoke to the marine standing guard and said, "i would like to go in and meet with president bush."

the marine replied, "sir, mr. bush is no longer president and no longer resides here."

the old man said, "okay," and walked away.

the following day, the same man approached the white house and said to the same marine, "i would like to go in and meet with president bush."

the marine again told the man, "sir, as i said yesterday, mr. bush is no longer president and no longer resides here."

the man thanked him and again walked away.

the third day, the same man approached the white house and spoke to the very same marine, repeating, "i would like to go in and meet with president bush."

the marine, understandably agitated at this point, looked at the man and intoned, "sir, this is the third day in a row you have been here asking to speak to mr. bush. i've told you already that mr. bush is no longer the president and no longer resides here. don't you understand?"

the old man replied, "oh, i understand. i just love hearing it."

the marine snapped to attention, saluted, and said, "see you tomorrow, sir!"
Morning meditation
Posted by Lis Riba at 9:20 AM

There is no such thing as the job fairy, who will magically gift me with a marvelous new job. It takes a lot of hard work to find a new job, and nobody else can do it for me, no matter how much I wish it were otherwise.

<sigh>

TOP

 

Copyright © 2002 - 2009 Elisabeth Riba,
All Rights Reserved