|
Saturday, September 18, 2004
Cat hiccoughs
I hadn't known it was possible, but Boopsie has come down with a case of the hiccoughs. She's been hiccupping for about 15 minutes now -- it started during a fight with the kitten (Violet) that began while Boopsie was eating. So, what hiccup cures can work on cats? I mean, most of the ones I know of require some form of human volition: chewing on a sugar cube, holding one's breath... I tried offering her water to drink, but so far she's refused. Help urgently requested! Okay, she just puked (or spat up) on the kitchen floor which seems to have taken care of the hiccups. Unfortunately, she just followed that up by pissing upon the bed. We just picked her up and locked her in the bathroom with the litterbox, but (a) the damage has been done (and laundry now must be (she only narrowly missed my pillow, but thankfully, she did miss)) and (b) she is not a happy cat.
Ian doesn't like the taste of hazelnuts
Which means the Nutella is mine. All mine! Yum.
Further filtering foulness
I can vaguely understand the desire to filter internet access for children -- I don't agree, but I can sympathize. But what excuse is there for filtering internet access for our nation's soldiers serving abroad? People who are presumably old enough to serve and fight and die for our country are being denied access to websites like:
- Victoria's Secret: Somebody in charge seems to have forgotten that women are also serving in the military. As Ginmar (a soldier serving in Iraq) points out: "I'm a girl, which means they're censoring me from looking at halfway decent underwear! Jesus Fucking Christ, if I can be trusted with a fucking weapon, can't I be trusted with a fucking thong?
- JavaJane: The Ladies Cafe, a chat board: Furthermore, websense apparently defines it as a "weapons" site, which not only makes no sense categorically, but shouldn't troops in a warzone be allowed to learn about weapons? [Nope, it's not a confusion with the military intelligence Jane's site, because that's accessible. Source: Ginmar
- Iraq Coalition Casualties and CNN: U.S. & Coalition/Casualties: According to Eric Umansky, they are blocked as "Extreme;Politics/ Religion" Again, both illogical categorization, and no discernible logical reason to deny soldiers the information, particularly about what's going on around them. [via Kevin Drum]
And our tax dollars are being spent to deny soldiers access to these sites. This is the reverse of standard library functionality, where it costs more to obtain something than not. Soldiers are getting internet access, and we're paying filtering companies to block these pages.
Poll positions
One poll calls the presidential race neck-and-neck, another gives Bush a ten-point lead. Whom to trust? Perhaps neither. Three new articles question the reliability of some of the major polls.
Jimmy Breslin explains one problem: [T]elephone polls do not include cellular phones. There are almost 169 million cell phones being used in America today - 168,900,019 as of Sept. 15, according to the cell phone institute in Washington. <snip> "I don't use telephones anymore because there is no easy way to use them," John Zogby was saying yesterday. It was the 20th anniversary of the start of his polling company. <snip> "The people who are using telephone surveys are in denial," Zogby was saying. "It is similar to the '30s, when they first started polling by telephones and there were people who laughed at that and said you couldn't trust them because not everybody had a home phone. Now they try not to mention cell phones. They don't look or listen. They go ahead with a method that is old and wrong." Zogby points out that you don't know in which area code the cell phone user lives. Nor do you know what they do. Beyond that, you miss younger people who live on cell phones. If you do a political poll on land-line phones, you miss those from 18 to 25, and there are figures all over the place that show there are 40 million between the ages of 18 and 29, one in five eligible voters. And the great page-one presidential polls don't come close to reflecting how these younger voters say they might vote. The majority of them use cell phones and nobody ever asks them anything. And, Breslin points out, younger voters lean more towards Kerry than Bush, so polls omitting that demographic are skewed rightward. But that's (probable) stupidity, not malice. Steve Soto has uncovered a further bias in Gallup and CBS/NYT polls. They are intentionally weighting the sample towards Republicans The sample they're choosing for their polls is out of whack with the actual voting public in the last several elections. Meanwhile, Ruy Teixeira notes that the "likely voter" measures ain't the hottest either. Just something to keep in mind, when you hear the latest horserace results...
Friday, September 17, 2004
The pen is mightier than the sword?
I don't know whether that's why Ashcroft prefers law enforcement to investigate the records of bookstores and libraries over weapons dealers. Or maybe he just thinks that readers are wimps and thus safer targets. At any rate, airport security arrested a woman because they considered her weighted bookmark a concealed weapon. They didn't offer her the choice to put the bookmark in checked luggage or mail it home or even confiscate it. They arrested her! What they call "airport security" is simply insane.
Rosh Hashanah ramblings
I'm in a bit of a rambly mood at the moment; this post is probably as much for myself as for any other readers, so
Warning: Excessive unexplained Judaica. If you are not Jewish, ask for explanations, because I'm not elaborating on my thoughts right now.
Well, we just tossed our sins into the pond this afternoon. Also, because services yesterday skipped the Musaf repetition of the Amidah (and didn't have services today), we didn't get our full quota of 100 shofar blasts for the holiday. So Ian brought his shofar along, and we said the blessing over the shofar and did three reps (as I call them) to complete the count. What we didn't realize when we planned this little outing was that the local schools were letting out. So we had high school students walking past and asking what we were doing, "calling the ducks?" No, but in the middle a stork landed in the pond not too far away to observe. For tashlikh we used leftover french bread we had bought for stuffing. For some reason, I've been imagining somebody cooking up a meal of sin-fed ducks and scapegoat, and I'm wondering how halachically wrong that is...
Shortly before dinner Erev Rosh Hashanah, I rediscovered my copy of Eat and be satisfied, a history of Jewish food. I wished I had thought of it in time to post some of the comments on Rosh Hashanah cuisine to the blog, but I didn't and it feels too late now. Maybe next year (or for other holidays). I did end up reading the three sections (during the Talmudic era, Sephardic customs, and medieval Ashkenazic) aloud to Ian between courses. But to make up for that omission, I'll share a different excerpt about an important contribution Jews made to culinary history: [C]hocolate making became an important Jewish industry in Amsterdam in the 1660s, when Venezuelan cacao was imported into Holland, and the Jews laid the foundation for the famous Dutch chocolate industry. The Sephardim spread the secrets of chocolate making into France, particularly into Bayonne and Bordeaux, while by the eighteenth century there were Jewish chocolate makers in England. Further, the Jews of the Levant had a predilection for drinking coffee, and nowhere more so than in Egypt, where it was known as the "Jews' Drink." Not surprisingly, the Jews played an active role in spreading the habit of drinking coffee into western Europe. In 1650, ". . . Jacob, a Jew opened a Coffee House in the Parish of St. Peter in the East, Oxon; and there it was by some, who delighted in noveltie, drank," wrote Anthony Wood. This was the first reference to the use of coffee in England, while there was a further reference by Wood to Cirques Jobson, a Jew born near Mount Lebanon, who also ran a coffeehouse at Oxford and who may be identical to the person called Jacob but who may have been someone else. In the second half of the seventeenth century a number of Levantines, particularly Armenians, started opening coffee shops in Paris, but some such as Joseph, a Levantine, and Etienne of Aleppo may have been Jewish. In ur century Jews transferred the typical Viennese coffeehouse to the streets of many cities, including London and New York.
I hope it's not a bad omen for the year that the pomegranate we bought looked to have gone bad. There were enough good seeds to eat and say the blessings over, but it made me slightly uneasy in a superstitious way.
I still have the same gripe about the Conservative machzor as I have every year. And I have finally had enough. During services I started thinking about buying an Artscroll machzor to bring along solely for the silent Amidahs. Well, looking at their website (I thought they disabled it on holidays and shabbos, but somebody must've forgotten to turn the site off) I just discovered that Artscroll makes an Interlinear Machzor (they're also now doing interlinear benchers!) and hopefully one of the shops in Brookline has them in stock so I can get one before Yom Kippur. The interlinear series is a really cool and clever design, and I also love Artscroll's commentary in general.
I need to construct a tallis clip. I have for a while. I've looked at the commercial tallis-clips, but they all feel overpriced, and none have the look or feel that I want, so it's probably best for me to design my own. The problem is, I have little artistic talent :/ So while it's on my mind, I'm going to use this space to free-associate what exactly I want...
- Among fabric notions, I recently found the right kind of clip (akin to what children use to hold mittens to sleeves), although I have to shorten the connecting chains, and possibly find a way to prevent them from tangling.
- The tallis itself is solid ivory (or off-white), with embroidery to match. The only color is the tzitzit, which have one strand of tekhelet. So, for the most part I want something not-garish: ivory or offwhite, or perhaps some muted blues and purples.
- I would like to have a small yad of some sort for following along. Maybe this would also be hanging/dangling, or it could have some sort of clip attachment. Something like a fingertip ring, but with a yad instead of those gothy-claws. Probably something I'd have to make for myself, with a ring and a yad pendant and a glue gun. Maybe using a thimble for the base, instead. [Ian suggested starting with banjo picks, but those seem to have the pointer on the side or bottom of the finger.]
- I definitely like the idea of having several detachable long ribbons which I can use as bookmarks during the service.
- Imagery: Artscroll has a little meditation one can read upon putting on the tallis, which includes the line "May the tallis spread its wings over them [my life-force, spirit, sould, and prayer]and rescue them like an eagle rousing his nest, fluttering over his eaglets." I like that wings imagery. I once saw some pearl buttons with an abstract wing shape that I liked, but i didn't buy them in time and haven't seen their like since.
And that's all I can think of at the present time.
Friday cat blogging
Political cats. Be sure to read the comments.
While watching the kittens' rivalry in our apartment a few nights back, I realized that Chez Goth could, with very little modification, be reworked into Chez Cat. Readers unfamiliar with the original games can probably skip the rest of the post, but really, what goals do cats have beyond slack and shiny objects? Players would all be cats living in the same apartment. Heck, there are already a sufficient number of named cats in the existing Chez Geek game and expansion sets. Now cats don't have income, so some other mechanism would have to be added. Also, there should probably be more options for cats to steal things from other players.
- Sleep cards would be locations: Sunbeam, on top of tv, bed. Cards that cancel sleep would have extra effects against locations: thunderstorm, loud action movie, humans having nookie...
- "Fixed" card can be played on an opponent to prevent future nookie.
I had other ideas when I came up with it, but it was too late in the evening for me to blog it (yes, there is such a thing) and I have since lost my train of thought.
Wednesday, September 15, 2004
What's cooking?
That's amusing, I was checking referrers via SiteMeter, and discovered I got a hit from a Google search on "potato kugel and Rosh Hashonah". I checked to see what said viewer might be reading and came upon menus from my last two Rosh Hashonahs, both spent with my family: 2002:
Probably the best way to describe Rosh Hashonah is as follows:
Friday night, six people at my parents: chicken soup with rice and soup nuts, gravlax, olive salad, tongue in raisin sauce, sesame soy chicken, mixed vegetables, sweet potato crunch, apricot honey rice, honey cake and citrus salad.
Saturday afternoon, fourteen people at my grandparents: gefilte fish, chopped liver, chicken soup with kreplach, veal cutlets, pot roast, potato kugel, honeyed carrots, with various cakes and pastries for dessert.
Sunday afternoon, a dozen people at my parents: sauteed green peppers, chicken soup, olive salad, veal brisket with stuffing, tongue in raisin sauce, sesame soy chicken, green beans, sweet potato crunch, honey cake and citrus salad. 2003:
Menus for the weekend:
- Friday night at my parents': 9 people: gravlax, chicken soup, veal (brisket, strip steak & ribs), 2 kinds of chicken, sweet potato crunch, rice & apricot dish, garlic green peppers, green beans. Dessert included tortoni, mocha torte and honey cake
- Saturday afternoon at my grandparents': 14 people: chopped liver, gefilte fish, chicken soup with knaidlach, roast beef, potato kugel, stuffed cabbage, baby carrots in honey; assorted cakes for dessert
- Sunday afternoon at my parents': 12 people, similar menu to Friday night
This year, due to interference from a big blowhard named Ivan, we didn't get to go to Florida. Mom played hardball, trying to lure us with tales of veal and other scrumptious dishes, but by that time we had already cancelled our flight. So, this year Ian's cooking and it'll just be the two of us (although we invited his parents, they already had other plans).
What's cooking so far... We've got three kinds of honey, homemade sweet challah, chicken soup with rice & kreplach, veal roast and stuffing, green beans and spaetzele, and for dessert: pomegranate and a honey cake from my mother's recipe. We bought a cactus pair to say Shehechianu over. You can read Ian's journal for further details. No potato kugel this time: we forgot about it when menu planning, but he'll make it some other time, I'm sure (maybe we carboload for Yom Kippur?) The meal as a whole may not be as elaborate, but the house doesn't smell any less delicious.
Worldcon wrapup
Well, it took me long enough, but my Worldcon wrapup is finally available and online. I put it on a separate page to avoid cluttering up people's aggregators -- it totals about 47,000 words. Yes, it's long-winded, but it was also a long con.
I wrote it thematically, rather than chronologically, so to make it easier to jump to the topic you want, here's a quick TOC:
Enjoy! Comments and links always welcome!
And if you (or I) sign off for the day before getting any further, L'Shana Tova!
Tuesday, September 14, 2004
Have you seen
I appear to be in a chatty mood today, with lotsa little links.
Since font geeks and typeface aficionados are apparently coming out of the woodwork this week, I thought I'd share an oldie I first posted at the beginning of the year: Behind the Typeface: Cooper Black. It's a Flash movie giving the (surprisingly fascinating) history of a font, filmed in the style of VH1's Behind the Music. Quite enjoyable.
Also, a blogger currently serving in Iraq recently posted a very funny list of personal guidelines so she won't get court martialed while her captain is on leave. (#20: "It's not nice to salute the brand-new lieutenants first thing in the morning when they have coffee in their right hands.") I don't want to risk getting hir in trouble by posting the link, in case superior officers notice, so instead I'll just share another oldie: The 213 things Skippy is no longer allowed to do in the U.S. Army.
Added later: Well, other bloggers have identified the list-creator, so here's the link: it's Ginmar's.
Happy endings
Now which candidate is actually actively creating jobs?
Earlier this week, I read with sorrow and bitterness of a woman who lost her job for having a Kerry/Edwards sticker on her car. For those who haven't heard the story, here's how her hometown press reported it: Gobbell gave this account: "We were going back to work from break, and my manager told me that Phil said to remove the sticker off my car or I was fired," she said. "I told him that Phil couldn't tell me who to vote for. He said, 'Go tell him.' " She went to Gaddis' office, knocked on the door and entered on his orders. "Phil and another man who works there were there," she said. "I asked him if he said to remove the sticker and he said, 'Yes, I did.' I told him he couldn't tell me who to vote for. When I told him that, he told me, 'I own this place.' I told him he still couldn't tell me who to vote for." Gobbell said Gaddis told her to "get out of here." "I asked him if I was fired and he told me he was thinking about it," she said. "I said, 'Well, am I fired?' He hollered and said, 'Get out of here and shut the door.' " She said her manager was standing in another room and she asked him if that meant for her to go back to work or go home. The manager told her to go back to work, but he came back a few minutes later and said, " 'I reckon you're fired. You could either work for him or John Kerry,' " Gobbell said. Oh, and later in the article, it says the employer regularly put pro-Bush messages in the employees' paychecks. I hadn't bothered blogging this, because it just made me sad for the state of the country. But, it looks like there's a happy ending. Slate reports: [L]ate this afternoon, Kerry himself phoned Gobbell. "He was telling me how proud he was that I stood up," Gobbell told me. "He'd read the part where Phil said I could either work for him or work for John Kerry. He said, 'you let him know you're working for me as of today.' I was just so shocked." So, at least one candidate in this rate is gaining a reputation for creating jobs rather than costing them. I could post links to the overall unemployment rate or to the small scale of the people fired from their jobs for the audacity of being opponents trying to see the President (here's one case, and I know I've blogged about others).
I love my husband. I'm just sayin'. [The house smells of chicken soup; the challah dough is finally rising; he's making a honey cake right now, and we just bought a cactus pear to say a shehechianu over. Life is good.]
Cats make great pets -- out of their owners
There is a story that Mohammed's cat Muezza once fell asleep on the sleeve of his master's robe -- instead of disturbing his beloved cat when he had to leave, Mohammed cut off the sleeve of his robe.
I am neither a seamstress nor prophet, but I have had to get comfortable cats off of clothing. It seems to me that it would probably be less damaging to the fabric to carefully rip out the stitches on one of the seams and re-sew it than to deal with cat scratches and snags in the material itself (caused by the cat either angrily digging in or just wanting to play tug-of-war). [Title quote courtesy of NancyButtons, whom you should all browse and buy from!]
Urban legend?
Earlier this afternoon, Tom Tomorrow asked: Quick question Does anyone have a verifiable and direct--i.e., not secondhand--cite for Wolfowitz's famous "rose petals" line?
I figured, I'm a librarian with a little free time, so I fired up LexisNexis and started digging through the news archives.
And I've turned up... nothing
I searched the newsfile from 9/11 until well into the war. I can see critics using the image derisively, both before and after the invasion, but no firsthand quotes of someone seriously saying the troops would be welcomed with rose petals and rice.
Here are the earliest and most pivotal examples I turned up:
- The reaction of Iraqis to a unilateral attack by the United States, or the U.S. and Britain, also concerned retired Ohio State University history professor Raymond Dominick, 56. He said National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice was misreading history when she predicted Iraqis would welcome the American "liberation" from a dictator the same way the Germans did in 1945. "The fact is, the German people fought to the bitter end. Years later they could look at it as a liberation, but certainly not at first. We better not count on them throwing rose petals at our feet."
- -- Mansfield News Journal (Mansfield, OH), September 30, 2002 Monday, Pg. 1A, 465 words, Residents opposed to Iraq attack, David Benson
- We will attack Iraq and bring about regime change. Our smart bombs will destroy the Iraqi infrastructure. No more bridges, roads, water, public buildings, etc. We will then kill off the sons, brothers and husbands who are in the Iraqi military with ease and practically no loss of American life or property. The mothers, fathers, wives, and orphans will then throw rose petals under the feet or our GIs as they march through Iraq, not as conquerors, but as liberators, and everyone lives happily after. I don't think so!
- -- Press Enterprise (Riverside, CA), October 3, 2002, Thursday, Pg. A11, 881 words, READERS' OPEN FORUM, THE PRESS-ENTERPRISE
- WOLF BLITZER: But you don't believe that these people will be so happy to have this dictator, this tyrant removed from them, if you will, that they'll be throwing rose petals at General Franks and his troops when they move into Baghdad?
- -- CNN, CNN LATE EDITION WITH WOLF BLITZER 12:00, February 23, 2003 Sunday, Transcript # 022300CN.V47, News; International, 21696 words, Showdown: Iraq, Faruk Logoglu, Salem Al-Sabah, Karim Kawar, Don Carcieri, Patrick Lynch, Duncan Hunter, Jim McDermott, Karl Inderfurth, Pat Lang, Robin Wright, Sean O'Keefe, Mark Sanford, Bill Richardson, Mark Warner, Paul Wertheimer, Thomas Von Essen, Arterea Jackson, Wolf Blitzer
- All this leading up to the glorious march of the liberators into Baghdad where they will be met by embraces and rose petals. Uh huh.
- -- Chapel Hill Herald (Durham, NC), February 25, 2003 Tuesday, Final Edition, EDITORIAL; Pg. 2, 866 words, Should we fear our government?, S.A.M. BROOKS Guest column
- MAHER: I think people, if they want to know what's going to happen in Iraq, consider this analogy. Now they've tried to present it like it's all going to be rose petals on the liberators as they march down the streets in Baghdad. No, what you should picture is Waco. Iraq is Waco.
- -- CNN, CNN LARRY KING LIVE 21:00, February 26, 2003 Wednesday, Transcript # 022600CN.V22, News; International, 8083 words, Interview with Bill Maher, Bill Maher, Larry King
- US marines took Safwan at about 8am yesterday. There was no rose-petal welcome, no cheering crowd, no Stars and Stripes.
- -- The Guardian (London), March 22, 2003, Guardian Home Pages, Pg. 1, 938 words, War in the Gulf: 'You're late. What took you so long? God help you become victorious', James Meek in Safwan
- Mr. GALLOWAY: The mismatch is that in Mr. Rumsfeld's version of the plan there were these expectations of quick success, of the southern Iraq Shiites rising up against the Ba'athist regime and greeting us by throwing rose petals at our tanks, and this has not happened.
- -- FRESH AIR, Fresh Air (12:00 Noon PM ET) - NPR, March 26, 2003 Wednesday, 5154 words, Joseph Galloway, military affairs correspondent for Knight Ridder newspaper, discusses the risks of the military campaign in Irag, TERRY GROSS
- Judith Yaphe, the chief CIA analyst on Iraq during the first Gulf War, said that Mr Rumsfeld and his deputy, Paul Wolfowitz, consistently preferred to rely on the optimism of Iraqi opposition groups in exile, and Israeli intelligence.
"It was a fantasy," she said. "They had a strategic vision that we would face no opposition, that everyone would surrender, that Iraqis would throw rose petals and rice. Clearly those judgments were not based on reality."
- -- SUNDAY TELEGRAPH(LONDON), March 30, 2003, Sunday, Pg. 16, 1689 words, 'Not everybody wants to be seen too close to Don Rumsfeld right now' After the setbacks of the military invasion, there is dissent now as well as bitter recriminations within the Bush administration. As JULIAN COMAN in Washington reports, the US Defence Secretary is emerging as the fall guy amid accusations of ignored intelligence and poor tactics, By Julian Coman
And after that, we're into the invasion, where everybody keeps pointing out how troops weren't welcomed with rose petals.
Tom Tomorrow heard it was Wolfowitz; Joseph Galloway attributes it to Rumsfeld; Judith Yaphe credits them both. But no links to anybody earnestly saying that's what they expect.
Now there is more news than LexisNexis keeps in its archives (particularly since the Tasini decision), but you'd think somebody would have the direct quote, if one existed.
If this is an urban legend, how did it gain so much prominence? I think it may be the Judith Yaphe remark that really did it. I Googled on one of the blogs I seemed to remember reading about a rose petal welcome, and all it had was a link to that story and her quote. However, that doesn't entirely explain some of the earlier remarks, such as Bill Maher talking about what "they" say, implying the administration...
It's certainly a plausible enough remark, so much so that I was surprised not to find it. That may be what makes it so compelling.
I haven't stopped looking, and if anybody else finds a better resource, please let me know about it as well as telling Tom Tomorrow, who made the original request.
Speed readers
Rather impressive that Kitty Kelley's new book on the Bush family only hit bookstores today, yet Amazon.com already has 41 reader reviews, fairly evenly split among the highest possible rating (17 five-star reviews) and the lowest possible (19 one-star reviews). No, I haven't bothered doing much more than skim the reviews, but I seriously doubt most of them have read anything beyond news articles about the book (particularly the seven reviews posted before the book was even released). Added later: As of 9:30 PM, there are now 74 reviews, the average remaining at the three-star midpoint.
Condemned to repeat it?
While looking up a title for my previous post, I came across Writer's Rights: 1,229 Quotations on the First Amendment (direct link to the PDF), which had this disturbingly relevant quote:
Only a free and unrestrained press can effectively expose deception in government. And paramount among the responsibilities of a free press is the duty to prevent any part of the government from deceiving the people and sending them off to distant lands to die of foreign fevers and foreign shot and shell. -- HUGO L. BLACK (1886-1971), U. S. Supreme Court Justice, Pentagon Papers Case, 1971.
I am neither a lawyer nor old enough to remember this case. But why isn't this quote being shouted from the rooftops by those who've already lived through it? Spread the word where you can. Postscript: According to the Iraq Coalition Casualty Report, 1,013 members of the U.S. military have died in Iraq since the invasion began in March, 2003.
You don't say
Get a load of the front page on today's Boston Herald:
What typesize is that? Keep in mind, this is the conservative blue-collar paper in the area. So much for burying the story, hunh?
Of course, other efforts are proving more successful. Last week's New York Times reported: A representative of the White House recently called Neal Shapiro, president of NBC News, to discourage that network from broadcasting interviews with Ms. Kelley about the book on its "Today'' program and on its MSNBC cable program "Hardball With Chris Matthews,'' a network executive said. <snip> [A] Bush-Cheney campaign official confirmed that "we called NBC and expressed our concern."
And it appears that pressure is having an effect. Dan Kennedy and Salon have both remarked on how uncharacteristically harsh Matt Lauer has been attacking Ms. Kelley during their interviews:
- Dan Kennedy on Day 1:
- I was struck by the way that Matt Lauer hit her with almost nothing but Republican talking points
- Salon on Day 2:
- Kelley has come under constant attack from Lauer who appears more interested in her reporting methods than any of the revelations in her book.
There's one more day of interviews to go. Think it'll be any more balanced?
Given all this it's somewhat refreshing to see not everyone is bowing down to the whims of the mighty White House Wurlitzer and their talking points. It'll be interesting to see what kind of media coverage the book gets now that it's on the shelves (the book was released today).
Curiously enough, as of noon I couldn't find a single link on the Herald's homepage to today's cover story, though it was there this morning. I finally found it through the Election 2004 sidebar, after scrolling down one screen, where the story gets a much less prominent blurb than one would expect for such a large headline...
By the way, speaking of books critical to the administration, Seymour Hersh's book on Iraq and Abu Ghraib was released yesterday. You may not have heard, since it's gotten buried in all the blather about 30 year old typewriters...
Holiday preparations
With the High Holidays approaching, I thought I'd remind folks about the electronic Al Chet I found many years ago, in case anybody finds it useful. I realize we've still got a week-and-a-half before Yom Kippur, but I wanted to make sure people had plenty of time to see and print it (if so desired) before the holiday. I still haven't gotten around to updating them for the blogosphere, so if anyone wishes to take a stab at it, please be my guest. I'd even be willing to post the updated version here, with credit.
Monday, September 13, 2004
Spoiler question for The Queen's fool
I just finished reading Philippa Gregory's popular novel, The Queen's fool and I've got a question about the ending. Probably spoilers, so I'll write 'em in white-on-white: Maybe I was reading to fast and missed this, but what happened to Daniel's mother and sisters in the end? Is it ever mentioned? I'll say no more to avoid spoiling the story for others whose browsers might see through this transparent ploy, but it made for an awfully convenient resolution. I will add that aside from that nagging question, I found the book quite satisfactory. And I'm extremely pleased that the author had the consideration to include her bibliography: two pages of books, some of which I've read and others which I may add to my ever-growing list of titles I'd like to read.
Breaking up is hard to do
Something interesting occurred to me yesterday. A friend was asking for support because she just ended a friendship, and said that it was harder than breaking up with a boyfriend.
I've done something similar. In fact, I once wrote Miss Manners for advice (2nd letter). And it is harder to break off a friendship. So, I started wondering why that might be.
There's an expectation in this culture that romantic relationships may end. With luck, they'll last forever, but we understand that not every one works out, and sometimes they end well and sometimes they end poorly. There's no such expectation about friendships. There seems to be this sense that friends may drift apart, but aside from that friends are friends for life. That when you meet a childhood friend or go to your high school reunion you'll immediately reconnect and be just as close as before, and it's only distance that separated you. There are established rituals surrounding breakups in romantic relations, whether it's the guys taking him out drinking, or her curled up crying into the phone with a pint of ice cream: we comprehend that. But not for friendships. There's no comparable support structure in that regard. And I find that really odd, because people have more friendships than romantic relationships. Am I missing something here, or does this map to your experiences as well? What do you think on this?
Sunday, September 12, 2004
Words, words, words
Just to demonstrate I haven't fallen off the face of the planet re:politics, an interesting pair of articles in today's Boston Globe: Together, something to chew on. [Google on George Lakoff for more of his excellent observation about language in current politics. Very enlightening.]
It is official
After a fair bit of back and forth the last couple days, we are not going to Florida this week. Now, what am I going to do with all these library books?
|