|
Saturday, June 17, 2006
Another Carnival!
Via Ragnell: The Carnival of Feminist Science Fiction and Fantasy Fans!
This is to draw attention to lesser known bloggers, to bring individuals of like-minded (or at least, understanding) interests together, and to foster the growth of feminist fan communities. It'll be held on July 2nd, deadline for submissions is June 29th...
Now that's one I know lots of us can find things to write about!
Whee!
Fifty Book Challenge
Several people I know participate in something called the Fifty Book Challenge, the idea being that one tries to read fifty books in one calendar year.
Since I began tracking all the books I finish, back in mid-2000, I've never read fewer than sixty, so I didn't bother to officially join any of the communities.
At any rate, I just now finished book #50 for the year.
Book #50 was Temping fate, a brand new YA novel by Esther Friesner, involving a young woman who finds summer work with three rather unusual sisters... I bought it last night at the grand opening of Pandemonium in its new location.
Book #49 was another YA novel, Lady with an alien by Mike Resnick. Fun book. It's part of a series, in which each work is based upon a famous painting. Most appear to be straightforward historical fiction, but Resnick took one look at the creature in the woman's arms, and thought that Leonardo was too good an anatomist... "and that little animal simply doesn't look like an ermine to me."
As I said, fun book. It's nice reading stories where none of the characters are stupid. And I'm particularly fond of this passage. The first speaker is a time-traveller from the future:
"Speaking of codes, there was a time, centuries in my past, when you were thought to have hidden one in your work."
"A code?" repeated Leonardo.
"That's right."
"A code to what?"
"Believe it or not, the Holy Grail."
"If I knew where the Grail was, I wouldn't leave codes for others," snorted Leonardo. "I'd go find it and claim it for myself."
At any rate, the 50 books I've read this year breaks down as follows:
- 16 works of nonfiction,
- 14 works of novel-length fanfiction,
- 11 works of YA fiction,
- 8 works of adult fiction, and
- 1 work of YA nonfiction.
Two of the works I've read previously in earlier years, all the rest were first reads.
You can find the full list of all books I've read this year on my Books Read This Year page, links going back to mid-2000.
Meanwhile, I've got two other books out of the library to finish: Avalon High by Meg Cabot and Ready, steady, go! : the smashing rise and giddy fall of Swinging London. I was about 80 pages into the latter before picking up Lady, which I found simply irresistable. Ready, steady isn't quite what I was looking for -- primarily focused on the people and personalities of the 1960s, where I wanted a broader social look at postwar London. But I've got a list of other books that may cover that subject; my only trick is finding the right one...
PS: After leaving Pandemonium, we walked around the corner to Rodney's Bookstore, where we stayed until closing and struck up a chat with a really interesting guy.
I didn't have time to evaluate and buy, but here are a few of the titles that caught my eye:
Friday, June 16, 2006
To help us through this minefield...
Don't ask for backstory, but there are huge debates going on in the feminist blogosphere regarding women performing blowjobs.*
Regardless of how you feel on this issue -- pro, anti, confused, or indifferent -- you simply must view this YouTube video: lessons on safe and unsafe sex, by Stephen Fry, Hugh Laurie, Dawn French, and Rowan Atkinson. Pay close attention to the variations of Position #4:
Enjoy!
*If you're really curious, you can follow the debate in these blog posts, particularly the last two: PS: Thanks to Keith DeCandido for the link.
I've been thinking...
A dangerous pastime, I know.
What constitutes a group for purposes of group insurance coverage?
Because I keep reading posts and comments by other bloggers who are suffering in some way because they can't afford individual health insurance.
Health insurance works best when the risk is spread across a pool of people. This way, the healthy can support the sick, without unfairly burdening any individual with unaffordable premiums. [For more on this notion, see this old post of mine quoting Malcolm Gladwell on The Moral Hazard Myth.]
Group insurance is usually handled through employers, but I've heard of other clubs or organizations that also provide insurance coverage.
And if Costco or certain AAA clubs can offer medical insurance to its members, shouldn't it be possible to turn bloggers into a group for health insurance purposes?
I'd think it would be a desirable population for insurers: average age from 20s to 40s, usually in sedentary jobs rather than high-risk ones, often in the computer industry.
Is this at all feasible? Anybody who knows more about insurance care to pick up this ball and run with it?
In other words: the song of the lyrebird
Okay, I am actually writing the content of this post myself, but since it is all just a clever ploy to get you to listen to some birdcalls, I think the title counts.
Ian tells some delightful stories about a mockingbird where he grew up which could imitate a garbage truck emptying a dumpster. The "beep-beep-beep" of a vehicle backing up followed by the loud grinding and rumbling -- so realistic that my in-laws filed noise complaints against a nearby business until they finally found the feathered culprit.
Anyway, apparently mockingbirds barely hold a candle to the lyrebird of Australia.
Male lyrebirds try to impress potential mates by demonstrating their skill in mimicry -- everything from other birdcalls to... well, you'll just have to hear it to believe it.
In April 2006, to celebrate naturalist David Attenborough's 80th birthday, the public were asked to vote on their favourite of his television moments. This clip of the lyrebird was voted number one. You can watch it as embedded Quicktime or in WMV format.
Also, via Wikipedia, this page of further lyrebird recordings.
[First seen on Magpie's blog]
In other words: a memorable meal
To celebrate our anniversary, Ian and I went to the Craigie Street Bistrot for a superb dinner. Ian took tasting notes throughout (they actually gave us a notecard and pencil at the start of the meal for such purposes), so I'll let him tell the tale, (recopied from his journal:
Lis's and my anniversary dinner
Two years ago, for our anniversary, Lis and I went to a wonderful restaurant called the Craigie Street Bistrot, on Craigie St, outside of Harvard Square. I wrote about the meal we had then. And we went back again this year, last night. Okay, so our anniversary was on the thirteenth, and last night was the fourteenth, but the Chef's Whim is on Wednesdays and Saturdays. So, let me tell you about THIS trip. Two years ago, we spent $90 on the entire evening, for two hours of good food and company. This year, we spent over twice that, because a) the price has gone up $10 per person, b) they now added an option where you can get an EXTRA two courses for an extra $15 per person, and we got wine with dinner, which we didn't do last time. And we got THREE hours of good food and company. And it was definitely worth it. Six course tasting menu instead of four. Here's what we got: First, the chef sent us champagne cocktails, on the house, in celebration of our anniversary. They were wonderful -- I wrote a tasting note of "almost like ginger ale, but rounder." And, of course, better. The cocktail added sweetness and some fullness, and it was actually a decent champagne, although not so top-notch that one would be upset by adding things to it. Then I ordered, on the waiter's recommendation, a half-bottle of the 2000 Trimbach Riesling. I was looking for good links online that would have tasting notes for it, to explain the thing, but I'm only finding notes for the 2002 and 2003, which are totally different from what I drank. I'm finding online prices for the 2000 for as little as $24 for a half-bottle, which amazes me, because the restaurant price was less than twice that, and I'm used to a markup of three to four times. I mean, $24 for a retail half-bottle, and we got it, in a restaurant with full wine service, for only $46. If you can find this wine, you have GOT to try it. jehanna, I'm looking at you. The wine is wacky-nifty. It's the weirdest thing EVER. I don't know if I liked all the notes, but I found it really, really cool. So, you open the bottle and its initial nose is, honestly, petrol. And it drinks with an almost pickle-y taste for the first couple minutes. Then it opens up, and becomes floral, and a kind of astringent taste. And then it has an alcohol-y nose, and gets a little sulphur-y, and it keeps changing over the couple hours I was drinking it. I mean, by dessert, it had almost turned into what you EXPECT a Riesling to taste like. I don't know where the sweetness came from, but it did. And, of course, the rolls on the table are baked in-house, and are wonderful, but I'm assuming y'all know what really good simple bread tastes like -- the kind made from flour, water, yeast, and salt, and maybe using steam to crisp up the outside. Except they do it better than just about anyone else. So, on to the tastings. The first course was an arctic char pate. They didn't call it a "pate" -- I don't remember the word they used, because I didn't recognize it. I think it was something like "reillete", or "reyete" or something like that. [A commenter suggested this was probably a "rillette"] But it was arctic char, made into a pate consistency, with some lemon, and other flavors, with radish slices and mixed fresh herbs on top, and served with brioche toast. I don't normally like fish. Most people who know me know that. I usually will say simply that "I don't like fish", because it is simpler. The truth is, "I don't like fish that tastes like it is more than a couple hours old." I liked this. A whole lot. It was amazing. After a while, we got the second course. It was bluefish, served on a bed of wilted greens (I forget what kind, but they were good), with a reduced pan-juice sauce with brown butter and sherry. The bluefish had been caught that morning, fishing off a beach in South America. I forget exactly where in South America, but the point is, it was AMAZINGLY fresh. Looking back over my notes from two years ago, I note that we had bluefish then, too -- and this one and that one are the two best pieces of bluefish I've ever eaten. Looking around at the other diners who were getting the Chef's Whim (and you're not guaranteed to get the same thing as the people at the next table, but you often do), I think that this was one of the two courses that we wouldn't have gotten if we went for four instead of six courses. This fact makes me very happy that we went for the extended menu. The third course was a ragout with forest mushrooms, fresh greens including fiddlehead ferns, sorrel sauce, a lightly poached farm-fresh organic egg (laid that morning), and two pieces of blood sausage that had been made in-house. I like blood sausage. And this was, without a doubt, the absolute best blood sausage I've ever had. The fiddleheads were perfect -- which isn't easy: you pretty much have to pick them in the right ten minutes of the year -- the egg was amazing, the mushrooms were amazing. Oh, yeah. The other thing I can't stand are mushrooms. Except these. These were amazing. The sorrel sauce might have been a little overpowering, but it was served on the side, so you could add only as much as you wanted. Then we got to the fourth course, which was the other course that we got from the extended menu. It was a soup. A beef bullion with fresh ginger, confit, and forest mushrooms, among other flavors. It had an almost overpowering umami taste -- it was wonderful. And it was served with two pork croûtons. I bet you didn't know that you could make croûtons out of pork, did you? They are the same size and crunchiness as regular bread croûtons, but made out of pork and pork fat. The waiter told us that the staff, among themselves, refer to them as "porky croûtons of love". And I see why. You could put them in the soup, or you could just eat them plain. I did one of each. So then to the fifth course. Which, Lis and I agreed, was the weakest of the five courses, even though it was still amazingly good. It was a hangar steak from an organically raised Vermont cow, with a medallion of bone marrow, a burgundy-snail sauce on top, and a green garlic sauce on the side. I switched to a different wine for this course -- I got a half glass of Burgundy (I forgot to ask the vintage and vineyard), which I didn't write any tasting notes about, besides "earthy nose", because I just started drinking it, because it was good. So, I ate a snail. It was pretty good. And the sauce was good. Honestly, the weakest part of the course was the steak itself -- and that was because it was too heavily spiced. It had something of a pastrami flavor. Which I generally quite like, but I felt like it was fighting against the other flavors. I think I would have preferred the steak cooked without the spice rub, and just going with the flavors from the sauces. It was an AMAZINGLY tender piece of beef, and I frankly could have eaten it with no additional preparation, besides being cooked to perfection the way that it was. Then came dessert. With dessert, I finished off the Riesling, which, by that time, had magically turned into a dessert wine, and Lis ordered a glass of a dessert wine -- she let the waiter choose which one, as he knew what he'd be bringing, and could match a wine to it. Again, I forgot to get the name of the wine. Which is a pity, because Lis LOVED it. It was sweet, obviously, almost as sweet as a plum wine with a similar mouthfeel and drinking characteristics, but with more of an apple-y, cider-y flavor. Since Lis's two favorite alcohols are plum wine and cider, we were very impressed with the waiter's psychic powers, in finding the PERFECT wine for her. We got two desserts, and decided to trade them. Lis was served, and I ate, a rhubarb-and-dried fruit dish with a crumble topping, and homemade vanilla ice cream. I thought it was AMAZING -- a pretty simple, basic dessert concept, done just right. A similar effect to, like, a Brown Betty, something in that family of desserts. Done perfectly. What I got, and Lis ate, was something like a flan in texture, but white. On the side were blood orange slices and fennel sauce, and the flan was beautifully spiced. I really, really liked it, but liked the crumble better, and Lis liked the flan better -- it was sweeter. I only had one bite, so I don't really have a description of it, except, "yum." We spent an absolutely lovely three hours there, enjoying each other's company, and the food, and the wine. It was an amazing meal, but, if you'll excuse the glurge, the best part of it was being with my wife. Yes, the waiter got a really good tip, for recommending the Trimbach, and for choosing the perfect wine for Lis for dessert. ETA: Lis reminded me that this post isn't actually done! After dessert, we got another on-the-house course compliments of the chef. It was a champagne-orange soup with a yogurt sorbet. It was bitter, and sweet, and bubbly, and refreshing, and amazing. It was the best possible capper to the meal. Also, the chef came out, and we got to thank him for the amazing meal in person.
Now, Ian and I have a slight difference of opinion, as I was certain the final treat was a champagne-mango soup, but either way, it was divine.
The next time my parents are in town, I hope to treat them to the Chef's Whim. Hopefully with Ian's parents, too. They do offer a vegetarian version, and while the website says no substitutions, both upon making reservations and on arrival, the host asked if we had any food restrictions, so that might not be as strict as set out.
I wish I could afford to treat all my foodie friends -- we were thinking of jehanna and also Ayesha (particularly while sopping up the fennel in my dessert).
If you do go, leave plenty of extra time for parking. The restaurant has fewer spaces than there are tables, and it's in a residential neighborhood. You may have to circle a while before finding a space and having to shlep.
In other words: Carnival of the Feminists call for submissions
Since Bitch|Lab is hosting, I'll just quote her directly:
Bitch | Lab will be hosting the 17th Carnival of Feminists on June 21. The deadline for submissions is June 20. You can use the form at the Carnival of Feminists blog or send them to BL at carnival@pulpculture.org.
Suggested themes for the Carnival include:
1. Given what Carol Hanisch originally meant by the phrase, "the personal is political," how do you see your work as a continuation of what Hanisch and some of our early second wave foremothers envisioned?
You can learn more about what Carol Hanisch wrote in her new introduction to her original essay here, The Personal Is Political.
As Carol says at the end of the new introduction, she feels her words were used to mean something other than originally intended. I thought we should honor her by thinking about how we could and do reinvigorate her original meaning.
You can see her question to today's feminists here.
2. The virtues of being mouthy, talking back, refusing norms of politeness, etc.
The philospher Hypatia was appointed to the highest academic position in Alexandria. When sexually harassed in her classroom she got mouthy and flung "the 5th century version of a sanitary napkin at him, exclaiming that the joys of sex rather than those of philosophy were what was on the student's mind."
Hypatia, of course, didn't get away with it. Cyril, Bishop of Alexandria, hired or encouraged a group of Nitrian monks to punish her by stripping her, razing her, and rending her skin with sharp shells until she died. (from Mary Ellen Waith's A History of Women Philosophers, Vol. 1. in Bell and Klein's Radically Speaking: Feminism Reclaimed.)
Hypatia's story might make us think that being mouthy, talking back, and resisting norms of politeness might not be such a good idea. But, we keep on finding ways to mouth off, talk back, and be as impolite and impolitic as we wanna be.
3. Finally, it wouldn't be a party at Bitch | Lab if there wasn't some talk of sex positive feminism.
The carnival's actually coming to town on my birthday. I wonder if I could hit the trifecta of suggested themes by writing further about FSD...
Thursday, June 15, 2006
Mo(zilla) Better News
[An update to Tuesday's Smooth move, Mozilla]
Well, after receiving a firestorm of criticism over the last two days, Mozilla has backed down on their attempts to enforce terms on anyone using their generic feed icon, six months after the campaign towards universal adoption began.
Late yesterday, Frank Hecker, executive director of the nonprofit Mozilla Foundation, proposed recommended usage guidelines for use of the feed icon, along with a FAQ:
We propose that the feed icon be freely available for general use in connection with web feeds using open web syndication formats, without the need to enter into a trademark license agreement (or similar arrangement), and that these guidelines not be legally binding.
Mind you, LiveJournal's icon for syndicated feeds ( ) still violates the proposed guidelines, which request:
In particular, the icon should not be displayed ... with the colors of the icon inverted (e.g., white used instead of orange and vice versa)
Then again, Hecker notes that "some of the versions of the icon hosted on [feedicons.com] don't fully conform to the proposed visual guidelines," either. And feedicons.com is one of the main sites trying to popularize it as a standard.
There've been some other interesting developments as well, including questions whether Mozilla actually has trademarkable rights in the icon (raised by one of the icon's co-creators) and why it's so similar to the four-year-old logo for DVB Viewer...
FWIW, I've decided to wait on returning the feedicons to my UI until Opera restores it to their builds. Just to make sure there's no further funny business...
DVDriving me crazy
Nobody answered when I posted this last month, so I'm trying again on a less-busy day:
Earlier this year, I discovered:
Did you know that Windows XP doesn't support copying files to a DVD+R drive the way you can copy them onto a CD drive? You can only write to a DVD drive using a third-party program.
Can anybody recommend a good freeware and/or open source program for copying files to the DVD drive under Windows? An actual high-quality compressing backup would be useful, too, but right now I just want to copy files so anybody can read them from disk and I can free up space on my hard drive.
*Yawn*
You know, rainy nights aren't terribly restful if you've trained your subconscious to listen for the sound of a cat urinating nearby...
Wednesday, June 14, 2006
Decisions, decisions
Glenn Greenwald's book tour for How would a patriot act? finally makes its lone Boston stop:
Tuesday, June 20 6 p.m. Middlesex Lounge
315 Massachusetts Ave Cambridge, MA 617/868-6739
Meanwhile, Party at the Newbury Street LUSH
When: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 6-8PM Where: 166 Newbury Street
RSVP: (617)375-5874 or email boston@lush.com for a free goodie bag with RSVP and purchase
Hm. Rare chance to meet a blogger with whom I've exchanged comments and links, or free skincare products...
BTW, that sample soap sliver from Sabon? Based on fragrance and appearance, I think it's Grass. [Can't entirely tell, since they gave me a piece about the size of two pennies stacked.] At any rate, I love the scent; if I keep it by my desk, I find myself sniffing it compulsively.
I don't want to use it until I know what it is, but don't necessarily want to buy any until I've used it.
I suppose I'll have to go into the store with my sliver, ask them "which soap is this?", then go back home without buying to try it out...
Seems somewhat rude, but if they didn't want folks doing that, they should've labelled their samples, I suppose.
Saints preserve us! A different kind of potboiler
So, I just finished reading Pickled, potted, and canned: how the art and science of food preserving changed the world by Sue Shephard (out-of-print, but coming soon in a paperback edition).
The narrative is primarily organized themtically, by method, rather than chronologically or geographically. This allows technique to build upon technique, and really points up the convergences among extremely disparate cultures. However, if you're looking for information on the foods of a particular period or country, this may not be so helpful.
The book opens on a somewhat dry note (pun unintended) but quickly picks up steam. I've often heard that the best cuisines are often the peasant foods, where folks have been forced to make the best with what they have available. This book shows how much the available preservation methos have influenced those tastes: cheeses, sausages, pickles, preserves... In the process, you'll read about lots of fascinating dishes you may want to try, and several you may find revolting.
The latter half of the book focuses on innovations since the eighteenth century, such as canning and refrigeration. Since these are so much more recent, these chapters look more at the inventors themselves, and less on how it shaped people's daily diets.
[And yet again, this really makes me want to read up on the discovery of vitamins as vitamins and how those changed the way people ate. Also interests me in looking the other way and finally reading Eating right in the Renaissance.]
Previous book read was Black powder war, the third in Naomi Novik's Temeraire series (and last for a while, though she is working on future installments). Unfortunately, this one didn't wow me as much as the first two.
Spoilers for the series and theorizing follows; highlight to read:
Somebody once compared the dragon-bonding genre to romance novels, and pointed out that the ceremony at the end of the second book was analogous to a wedding. [Found the link!] If that's so, then you could characterize His Majesty's Dragon as primarily about Laurence & Temeraire getting to know one another, while in Throne of jade, the threat of separation hung heavy over them. By this third book, their relationship was established enough to be relatively stable. And thus, there was little tension between them, and not as much room for character growth. I'm not saying there was none, but not enough for my tastes. I found myself wishing the new dragonet had hatched earlier, because it so livened up the story. Also, my lack of Napoleonic War history definitely seemed to take its toll. I no longer know what's historical and what's AU, and for some reason in this book it bothered me.
Yesterday evening I started Bad Prince Charlie by John Moore, which strikes me as cutesy but again not as compelling as the author's earlier books (The Unhandsome prince and Heroics for beginners).
One amusing bit I wish to share from early on -- no spoilers:
"With a pork chop?" said Packard
"It was one of those double-thick pork chops they serve at Almondine's."
"Oh yes, Those are great. A pity the cooks here at the castle never learned to do them that way. Either they come out raw in the middle or overcooked and dried out."
There followed a minor digression on the subject of grilled pork, with or without Almondine's signature apple chutney*, before Gregory returned to the subject. ...
* This looks like a good place for a footnote. Terry Pratchett and Susanna Clarke use lots of footnotes and they write bestsellers, so maybe I should also throw in a few.
[Heh, Amazon reviews of Pickled, potted, and canned criticize its lack of footnotes (a complaint I've also made about modern nonfiction), while it's been two years since I wrote about the increasing popularity of footnotes in fantasy fiction. The trend only seems to be intensifying. Explain that.]
I also picked up Ready, steady, go! : the smashing rise and giddy fall of Swinging London from the library, to hopefully build on the conclusions from London 1945 which I read last month.
What are you reading?
PS: Forthcoming book found while searching for something else: Treading the bawds: actresses and playwrights on the late-Stuart stage by Gilli Bush-bailey. Isn't that a great title?
Tuesday, June 13, 2006
The Language of Flowers
Of our online wedding pictures, this is probably the best image of my bridal bouquet.
So, here are the meanings of the predominant flowers we picked:
| Flower | Meaning |
| Anthurium | Hospitality |
| Lisianthus | Outgoing |
| Queen Anne's Lace | Sanctuary |
Even though we were ignorant of those meanings at the time, that's pretty good symbolism for establishing a life together, don't you think?
Yes, Lis and Ian got married amid blossoming lisianthus. Furthermore, Anne is my middle name, so I was doubly in the blooms.
And whether it's evidence of environment or genetics, my father was the first one to spot that little pun!
PS: On Edible Books Day 2004, I revealed the symbolism and puns in our wedding cake.
PPS: On further search, I find several sites attributing "Fantasy" to Queen Anne's Lace. In fact, the meanings for Queen Anne's Lace seem to be split about evenly between "Fantasy" and "Sanctuary". Both are cool, but I'm now curious to the origins and traditions behind each.
Realtime weather on Google Earth
With hurricane season thirteen days in, and Alberto already on his way up the coast, I thought folks might be interested in this find, via Inside Google:
The Map Room blog posts that the NOAA has made available real-time severe weather imagery for Google Earth. Besides being useful for everyone who cares about the weather, it looks like some cool data to see in Earth, just as is. Are we getting close to the point where anyone can get an experience akin to what you see on the local news, with their rotating maps and weather animations?
Smooth move, Mozilla
Or: How to Lose Friends and Influence People
Wikipedia:
In December 2005, the Microsoft IE team and Outlook team announced in their blogs that they will be adopting the feed icon first used in the Mozilla Firefox browser , effectively making the orange square with white radio waves the industry standard for both RSS and related formats such as Atom. Also in February 2006, Opera announced they too will add the orange square in their next release of Opera 9.
For over six months, FeedIcons.com has been spreading the word (and image files), evangelizing to promote consistency and reduce confusion.
And the icon is certainly spreading. LiveJournal has adopted a variant for its syndicated feeds, and I even switched to it in my updated design.
So, imagine my dismay when this morning's news feeds includes the following bit of bad news from Opera Watch:
Mozilla asks Opera to sign agreement before it uses its RSS feed icon The Mozilla Foundation asked Opera to sign an agreement on the use of its RSS feed icon in the Opera browser.
Here's Opera's official statement on the matter (in their build announcement):
Mozilla would like us (and other users of it) to sign an agreement on the use of the feeds icon. We fully respect their rights to the icon and will not use it as long as this isn't sorted out.
Yeah, Mozilla's filed a trademark on the icon.
And so nice of them to raise the issue within one month of Opera 9's ship date... over four months after Opera first expressed interest in using the icon!
Do you think Microsoft is being held to these terms, too, or is this just a way to shut out the third-party browser?
Heck, yeah, I'm ticked!
I've been a huge advocate within my company for standardizing on this icon in our UI.
Now I have to tell upper management they either have to sign some kind of licesning agreement with Mozilla, or we need to design a new graphic. Makes me feel like a chump for trusting in Mozilla. I thought their efforts to universalize the icon were an act of open-source altruism, not a way to make everyone beholden to them!
I'm still gathering information on how to present this at work, but for my own sake, I'm saying to heck with Mozilla! Until they shape up, I'm reverting my site design back to its old icon for feeds.
Update:On Thursday, I wrote “Mo(zilla) Better News,” which has the latest information on the issue.
For old times' sake
Aw, heck, you only just dropped me off at work, but this day needs to get a little more verse before I see you again...
 |
|
This day and age we're living in Gives cause for apprehension
With speed and new invention And things like fourth dimension.
Yet we get a trifle weary With Mr. Einstein's theory.
So we must get down to earth at times Relax relieve the tension
And no matter what the progress Or what may yet be proved
The simple facts of life are such They cannot be removed.
You must remember this A kiss is just a kiss, a sigh is just a sigh.
The fundamental things apply As time goes by.
And when two lovers woo They still say, "I love you."
On that you can rely No matter what the future brings
As time goes by.
Moonlight and love songs Never out of date.
Hearts full of passion Jealousy and hate.
Woman needs man And man must have his mate
That no one can deny.
It's still the same old story A fight for love and glory
A case of do or die. The world will always welcome lovers
As time goes by.
Oh yes, the world will always welcome lovers As time goes by.
Music and words by Herman Hupfeld
|
For those who didn't already know and/or haven't picked it up yet, "As time goes by" is our song.
Whaddaya say, love? Maybe a double feature of Casablanca and Desk Set tonight?
Yawn
I love and hate our cat.
Lucky Seven
It was seven years ago today that Ian and I stood under the chuppah, surrounded by our families and friends, and got married.
And, as usual for this time of year, I take another look at the vows I wrote:
|
I pledge myself to you -- body, mind and spirit. I promise to respect and honor you.
I promise to listen to you and to treat you with honesty, trust and understanding.
I promise to support and cherish you. I promise to stand by you and never shame you.
I promise to make "us" be the most important thing in my life.
And I pledge to provide a Jewish household for us and our children.
Ian, you and I complement each other; we complete one another.
We are like yin and yang, together forming a perfect circle.
You are the person with whom I wish to share the rest of my life.
You are my beloved. You are my friend. You are my husband.
|
I think I've done pretty well by those, and am more than willing to commit to uphold them for all my foreseeable future.
I recently found another poem I've been holding on to share with you:
|
To My Dear and Loving Husband
by Anne Bradstreet (c.1612-1672)
If ever two were one, then surely we. If ever man were loved by wife, then thee;
If ever wife was happy in a man, Compare with me, ye women, if you can.
I prize thy love more then whole mines of gold, Or all the riches that the East doth hold.
My love is such that rivers cannot quench, Nor aught but love from thee, give recompense.
Thy love is such I can no way repay, The heavens reward thee manifold, I pray.
Then while we live, in love let's so persever That when we live no more, we may live ever.
|
Traditional gifts for a seventh anniversary* are wool or copper. So, love... Penny for your thoughts?
[The modern seventh anniverary gift is a desk set, but since we already own the DVD of the film, that would probably be superfluous.]
Monday, June 12, 2006
YearlyKos 2006 or BloggerCon 2003?
The more things change, the more they stay the same. The first ever YearlyKos convention was held in Las Vegas last weekend, and many of the comments sounded awfully familiar:
1) Pam Spaulding, today about YearlyKos:
I flipped on CSPAN and the network was covering part of the YK convention live (with lots of technical difficulties; the network terminated the coverage after a while). I don't recall what the panel was specifically about -- it was some generic how-the-blogosphere-affects-politics kind of matter, but what caught my attention were the scarily inarticulate questioners getting up there during the Q&As, rambling on almost incoherently, not able to form a question.
They sort of reminded me of all the super-geeks I went to school with at Stuyvesant HS (and that was a school full of them -- I was merely a run-of-the-mill geek) -- full of enthusiasm, but just a few pancakes short of a stack socially. That's not to say that these folks aren't brilliant behind the keyboard when blogging about the same ideas, but a conference like this makes it clear that the successful "faces" of the blogosphere will remain the extroverts -- the ones comfortable in front of cameras and large groups, for better or worse.
Me, October 2003 about BloggerCon:
I raised my hand to ask a question, and by the time I finally got to speak, began with a statement that garnered applause and I've now seen quoted on several other blogs: "We're a roomful of people used to writing monologues trying to have a dialogue." As somebody else pointed out, the key question is often who can speak when; with weblogs, it can happen in parallel.
2) Campus Progress via Slant Truth, today about YearlyKos:
Overheard at Kos
The conference organizer asked, rhetorcially, at the final dinner before Harry Reid came on "And what is the face of this conference?"
Answer from the only Asian in the audience: "White."
Me, October 2003 about BloggerCon:
When Dave Winer talked about blogs as "raising consciousness on a global scale" somebody in the audience said that looking around the room, he saw utopia, saying that we weren't elites before blogging, but now so many strangers at the con recognized our names. Sorry, but looking around the room, I saw a mostly white, educated and upper-class crowd -- in other words, advantaged, and not representative of the world or even the broader culture across the city. And the fact that others in this little clique recognize one another's names was a nice egoboo, but to think that has broader significance felt... rather sad. We may be elite in terms of certain advantages (such as the time and ability to blog), but that doesn't make us better than the other 97% of the population that doesn't blog. Somebody tried to justify it that we were the "right 3%, which I found tremendously and unpleasantly hubristic.
It's like deja vu all over again.
|
Copyright © 2002 - 2009 Elisabeth Riba, All Rights Reserved
|